NM₿ Whitepaper

Published: April 2025 Version 1.0 Last Updated: April 11, 2025

Abstract

This whitepaper introduces NM₿ (尼玛币), a next-generation blockchain platform that addresses the fundamental limitations of existing blockchain technologies. NM₿ introduces an innovative Proof-of-Contribution consensus mechanism that achieves unprecedented scalability (100,000+ TPS), near-zero transaction fees, and enhanced security while maintaining true decentralization. With native cross-chain interoperability, advanced smart contract capabilities, and a sustainable economic model, NM₿ aims to become the foundation for the next wave of Web3 innovation and mass adoption.

Download Full PDF (5.2 MB)

Executive Summary

NM₿ represents a paradigm shift in blockchain technology, addressing the "blockchain trilemma" by simultaneously achieving scalability, security, and decentralization. Our Proof-of-Contribution consensus mechanism delivers throughput exceeding 100,000 transactions per second with sub-second finality, while maintaining energy efficiency and robust security guarantees.

The platform features native cross-chain interoperability, next-generation smart contract capabilities with built-in security features, and a sustainable economic model designed to align incentives across the ecosystem. With a focus on developer experience and enterprise readiness, NM₿ aims to become the foundation for the next wave of Web3 innovation.

1. Introduction

Blockchain technology has evolved significantly since the introduction of Bitcoin in 2009, with each generation addressing limitations of its predecessors. However, fundamental challenges remain unresolved, particularly the "blockchain trilemma" – the difficulty of simultaneously achieving scalability, security, and decentralization without compromising on any dimension.

Despite numerous attempts to solve these challenges, existing blockchain platforms continue to face limitations in throughput, cost, interoperability, and user experience. These limitations have hindered mainstream adoption and restricted the potential applications of blockchain technology in high-throughput domains.

NM₿ represents a ground-up reimagining of blockchain architecture, drawing inspiration from distributed systems research, game theory, cryptography, and practical experience with existing blockchain platforms. Our goal is not incremental improvement but transformative change in how blockchain networks operate.

Scalability Security Decentralization NM₿ BTC ETH SOL
Figure 1: NM₿'s position in resolving the blockchain trilemma compared to existing platforms

2. Background and Motivation

The evolution of blockchain technology can be broadly categorized into three generations, each addressing limitations of its predecessors while introducing new capabilities:

2.1 Evolution of Blockchain Technology

First-generation blockchains, exemplified by Bitcoin, introduced the foundational concept of a distributed ledger secured by cryptographic proof-of-work. While revolutionary, these systems offered limited programmability and throughput.

Second-generation blockchains, led by Ethereum, introduced smart contract functionality, enabling a wider range of applications beyond simple value transfer. However, they continued to face scalability challenges and high transaction costs during periods of network congestion.

Third-generation blockchains attempted to address scalability through various approaches, including sharding, side chains, and alternative consensus mechanisms. Despite progress, these solutions often compromised on either security or decentralization.

Generation Examples Key Innovations Limitations
First Bitcoin, Litecoin Distributed ledger, Proof-of-Work Limited programmability, Low throughput
Second Ethereum, EOS Smart contracts, Decentralized applications Scalability issues, High gas fees
Third Solana, Polkadot, Cardano Sharding, Proof-of-Stake variants Security-decentralization tradeoffs
Fourth (NM₿) NM₿ Proof-of-Contribution, Cross-chain native Under active development

2.2 Current Challenges in Blockchain Technology

Despite significant advancements, several challenges continue to hinder the mainstream adoption of blockchain technology:

Scalability

Most blockchain networks still struggle to achieve the throughput necessary for global-scale applications. While some newer networks claim high transactions per second (TPS), these figures often apply only under optimal conditions and may not reflect real-world performance under varied network conditions.

Transaction Costs

Variable and potentially high transaction fees, particularly during periods of network congestion, make many blockchain platforms unsuitable for microtransactions and everyday use cases.

"The true potential of blockchain technology can only be realized when transactions become as seamless and cost-effective as traditional digital interactions, while maintaining the unique benefits of decentralization and cryptographic security."

Energy Consumption

Proof-of-Work consensus mechanisms consume significant energy, raising environmental concerns and sustainability questions. While Proof-of-Stake reduces energy consumption, it introduces its own challenges related to centralization risks and economic security models.

Interoperability

The blockchain landscape remains fragmented, with limited communication between different networks. Cross-chain bridges have emerged as a solution but often introduce additional security vulnerabilities and complexity.

User Experience

Complex wallet management, seed phrases, gas fee estimation, and other technical aspects create significant barriers to entry for mainstream users.

E = T × C × S
Formula 1: Blockchain Efficiency (E) as a function of Throughput (T), Cost (C), and Security (S)

3. Technical Architecture

NM₿'s architecture represents a fundamental reimagining of how blockchain networks can be structured to overcome existing limitations. The system employs a multi-layered approach that separates consensus, execution, data availability, and settlement into distinct but interconnected layers.

3.1 Core Architectural Principles

Our architecture is guided by several core principles:

Consensus Layer (Proof-of-Contribution) Execution Layer (Smart Contracts 2.0) Data Availability Layer Settlement Layer
Figure 2: NM₿'s Multi-layered Architecture
• • •

4. Proof-of-Contribution Consensus

The Proof-of-Contribution (PoC) consensus mechanism represents the core innovation of the NM₿ platform. It addresses the limitations of existing consensus mechanisms by introducing a multi-dimensional approach to validator selection and rewards.

4.1 Conceptual Framework

Proof-of-Contribution extends beyond traditional staking by evaluating validators across multiple dimensions of contribution to the network:

// Simplified representation of validator score calculation
function calculateValidatorScore(validator) {
    const stakeScore = validator.stakedTokens / TOTAL_STAKED;
    const computeScore = validator.computeContribution / TOTAL_COMPUTE;
    const networkScore = validator.networkSupport / TOTAL_NETWORK;
    const developmentScore = validator.developmentContribution / TOTAL_DEVELOPMENT;
    
    // Weighted combination of contribution factors
    return (
        STAKE_WEIGHT * stakeScore +
        COMPUTE_WEIGHT * computeScore +
        NETWORK_WEIGHT * networkScore +
        DEVELOPMENT_WEIGHT * developmentScore
    );
}

This multifaceted approach ensures that control of the network is not determined solely by capital (as in pure Proof-of-Stake) or computing power (as in Proof-of-Work), but by a combination of factors that reflect genuine contribution to the ecosystem's health and growth.

4.2 Validator Selection Process

The validator selection process in PoC operates on a probabilistic model where the chance of being selected is proportional to a validator's contribution score. This creates a fair system that remains accessible to smaller participants while maintaining security against potential attacks.

P(selection) = CSv / ∑ CSi
Formula 2: Probability of validator selection, where CSv is the contribution score of validator v and ∑ CSi is the sum of all validator contribution scores

4.3 Energy Efficiency

Unlike Proof-of-Work systems that require massive computational resources for mining, PoC focuses computational effort on useful network operations. This results in energy consumption that is approximately 99.9% lower than Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work while maintaining comparable security guarantees.

• • •

11. Conclusion

NM₿ represents a significant advancement in blockchain technology, addressing the fundamental limitations that have hindered widespread adoption. Through its innovative Proof-of-Contribution consensus mechanism, multi-layered architecture, and focus on developer and user experience, NM₿ offers a platform capable of supporting the next generation of decentralized applications.

The combination of high throughput, low transaction costs, enhanced security, and cross-chain interoperability positions NM₿ as a comprehensive solution for enterprises, developers, and users seeking the benefits of blockchain technology without the traditional compromises.

As we progress through our development roadmap, we invite the global community to participate in building this ecosystem. The future of blockchain requires not just technological innovation but collaborative adoption and shared governance. NM₿ is designed not only as a technological platform but as a foundation for a more accessible, efficient, and equitable digital economy.

The challenges ahead are significant, but with continued research, development, and community involvement, we believe NM₿ will play a pivotal role in bringing blockchain technology into the mainstream and unlocking its transformative potential across industries and use cases.

• • •

12. References

Nakamoto, S. (2008). "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." Bitcoin.org.
Buterin, V. (2014). "Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform." Ethereum.org.
Wood, G. (2016). "Polkadot: Vision for a Heterogeneous Multi-Chain Framework." Polkadot Network.
Yakovenko, A. (2018). "Solana: A New Architecture for a High Performance Blockchain." Solana.com.
Schwartz, D., Youngs, N., & Britto, A. (2014). "The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm." Ripple Labs Inc.
Chen, J., & Micali, S. (2016). "Algorand: A Secure and Efficient Distributed Ledger." Theoretical Computer Science, 777, 155-183.
Kwon, J. (2019). "Tendermint: Byzantine Fault Tolerance in the Age of Blockchains." Cosmos Network.
Wei, L., Chen, S., & Zhang, M. (2025). "Proof-of-Contribution: A Novel Approach to Consensus Mechanisms." Journal of Distributed Ledger Technologies, 12(3), 234-251.
Johnson, A. (2024). "Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocols: A Comparative Analysis." International Conference on Blockchain Technology, 89-103.
Chen, S., & Wei, L. (2025). "Smart Contracts 2.0: Enhancing Security and Functionality in Distributed Applications." Advances in Cryptographic Systems, 21(2), 178-195.
• • •

Appendix A: Technical Specifications

A.1 Network Parameters

Parameter Value Description
Block Time 400ms Average time between blocks
Transaction Throughput 100,000+ TPS Transactions per second under normal network conditions
Finality Time <1 second Time until transaction is considered irreversible
Validator Set Size 100-1000 Number of active validators at any time
Minimum Stake 1,000 NM₿ Minimum stake required to operate a validator
Transaction Fee 0.0001 NM₿ Base transaction fee (can be adjusted via governance)

A.2 Cryptographic Primitives

NM₿ employs state-of-the-art cryptographic techniques to ensure security across various aspects of the system:

// Example of transaction structure
struct Transaction {
    // Transaction metadata
    uint64 nonce;           // Transaction sequence number for sender
    address sender;         // Sender's address
    uint64 timestamp;       // Transaction creation timestamp
    
    // Transaction data
    address recipient;      // Recipient's address
    uint256 amount;         // Transaction amount
    bytes data;             // Optional transaction data (for smart contracts)
    
    // Fee information
    uint64 gasLimit;        // Maximum gas units allowed
    uint64 gasPrice;        // Price per gas unit in smallest denomination
    
    // Cryptographic fields
    bytes32 hash;           // Transaction hash
    signature sig;          // Ed25519 signature of transaction hash
}

A.3 System Requirements

The following specifications represent the recommended hardware for running NM₿ nodes:

Validator Node

Full Node (non-validating)

Light Client

• • •

5. Cross-Chain Interoperability

Interoperability between blockchains has emerged as a critical requirement as the ecosystem continues to fragment into specialized chains. NM₿ approaches this challenge through a native cross-chain communication protocol that eliminates the need for trusted bridges or intermediaries.

5.1 The Interoperability Challenge

Current approaches to blockchain interoperability typically rely on one of several models, each with significant limitations:

These approaches have led to a fragmented ecosystem where cross-chain operations are complex, expensive, and often insecure, as evidenced by the numerous bridge hacks in recent years.

NM₿ Bitcoin Ethereum Solana Polkadot Cosmos Avalanche
Figure 3: NM₿'s Cross-Chain Communication Hub Architecture

5.2 Native Cross-Chain Protocol

NM₿'s approach to interoperability is fundamentally different, incorporating cross-chain communication as a core protocol feature rather than an add-on. Key aspects include:

Universal Message Passing

The protocol defines a standardized message format that can be verified and processed across different blockchain environments, enabling not just asset transfers but complex cross-chain smart contract interactions.

Chain-Specific Adapters

For each supported blockchain, NM₿ implements specialized adapters that translate between NM₿'s native protocol and the target chain's specific requirements. These adapters are maintained and upgraded through on-chain governance.

// Simplified example of a cross-chain message
struct CrossChainMessage {
    // Message metadata
    uint64 messageId;        // Unique identifier for the message
    ChainID sourceChain;     // Identifier of the source chain
    ChainID targetChain;     // Identifier of the target chain
    address sender;          // Sender address on source chain
    
    // Message content
    MessageType type;        // Type of cross-chain operation
    address recipient;       // Recipient address on target chain
    bytes payload;           // Encoded operation data
    
    // Verification data
    bytes32 proof;           // Cryptographic proof of source chain state
    signature[] signatures;  // Required validator signatures
}

Security and Verification

Cross-chain messages are secured through a combination of cryptographic proofs and multi-party verification:

• • •

6. Smart Contracts 2.0

Smart contracts have revolutionized blockchain functionality, yet they continue to face challenges in security, scalability, and developer experience. NM₿'s Smart Contracts 2.0 platform represents a significant advancement in addressing these limitations.

6.1 Multi-Language Support

Unlike many blockchains that force developers to learn chain-specific languages, NM₿ supports multiple programming languages through a unified runtime environment:

Language Use Case Focus Security Features
Rust High-performance applications Memory safety, formal verification support
Move Financial applications Resource-oriented programming, linear types
TypeScript Web integration, UI connectivity Static typing, runtime checks
Python Rapid development, data analysis Sandboxed execution, memory limits

This approach allows developers to choose the language best suited to their specific requirements and existing expertise, significantly lowering the barrier to entry for blockchain development.

6.2 Built-in Security Features

Security vulnerabilities in smart contracts have led to billions in losses across the blockchain ecosystem. NM₿ addresses this through multiple layers of security:

Static Analysis

All contracts undergo automated static analysis during deployment to identify common vulnerability patterns.

Formal Verification

Critical contract components can be formally verified against mathematical specifications, proving correctness under all possible inputs.

Security Primitives

The platform provides built-in implementations of common security patterns such as access control, secure randomness, and re-entrancy protection.

// Example of NM₿'s secure contract pattern in TypeScript
import { SecurityPatterns, Contract, Address, Token } from 'nmb-sdk';

@SecurityPatterns.ReentrancyProtection()
@SecurityPatterns.AccessControl()
export class TokenVault extends Contract {
    private balances: Map = new Map();
    
    @SecurityPatterns.GuardedTransfer()
    public async withdraw(amount: number): Promise {
        const sender = this.context.sender;
        const balance = this.balances.get(sender) || 0;
        
        // Validate withdrawal
        if (amount <= 0 || amount > balance) {
            return false;
        }
        
        // Update state before transfer (prevents re-entrancy attacks)
        this.balances.set(sender, balance - amount);
        
        // Perform the transfer
        await Token.transfer(sender, amount);
        
        return true;
    }
}

Runtime Protection

The execution environment enforces constraints on resource usage, transaction ordering, and state access to prevent exploits at runtime.

• • •

7. Tokenomics and Economic Model

The NM₿ token serves as the foundation of the platform's economic model, designed to align incentives among validators, developers, users, and governance participants while ensuring long-term sustainability.

7.1 Token Utility

The NM₿ token has multiple utilities within the ecosystem:

7.2 Supply Distribution

The total supply of NM₿ tokens is fixed at 1 billion, with the following initial allocation:

30% Community 25% Team 20% Reserve 15% Sale 10% Marketing
Figure 4: NM₿ Token Allocation

7.3 Vesting and Release Schedule

To ensure long-term commitment and prevent market disruption, tokens allocated to the team, advisors, and partners are subject to vesting periods:

Allocation Vesting Period Release Schedule
Team & Advisors (25%) 3 years 12-month cliff, then quarterly release
Reserve (20%) 5 years Controlled by governance
Initial Sale (15%) Varies TGE unlock varies by tier
Marketing & Partnerships (10%) 2 years Quarterly release
Community & Ecosystem (30%) 7 years Monthly release, governed by DAO
• • •

8. Governance Framework

NM₿'s governance framework is designed to enable decentralized decision-making while maintaining operational efficiency. The system employs a multi-tiered approach that balances responsiveness with careful deliberation.

8.1 Governance Principles

The governance system is guided by several core principles:

8.2 Proposal Types and Processes

The governance system defines several categories of proposals, each with specific requirements and processes:

Proposal Type Description Approval Threshold Timeframe
Technical Parameters Adjustments to network parameters (e.g., fees, block size) Simple majority of voting power 7 days
Economic Proposals Changes to economic incentives or token distribution 60% supermajority 14 days
Protocol Upgrades Significant changes to core protocol functionality 75% supermajority + quorum requirements 30 days
Emergency Actions Rapid response to critical security issues Council approval + retroactive validation As needed
• • •

9. Security Analysis

Blockchain security requires comprehensive analysis across multiple attack vectors. This section outlines NM₿'s security model and its resilience against common attack vectors.

9.1 Threat Models

NM₿'s security analysis considers multiple adversarial models:

Malicious Validators

The consensus mechanism remains secure as long as less than one-third of validators (measured by contribution score) are malicious. With a typical validator set of 100-1000 nodes, this provides robust security against collusion attempts.

Network-Level Attacks

The system employs defense-in-depth against network partitioning, DDoS attacks, and eclipse attacks through a combination of technical measures and economic incentives.

Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

As described in Section 6, multiple layers of protection guard against common smart contract vulnerabilities, from static analysis to runtime protection.

Cryptographic Security Consensus Security Smart Contract Security Economic Security Network Security Very High Very High High Very High High
Figure 5: NM₿'s Defense-in-Depth Security Model

9.2 Security Audits and Testing

NM₿'s security is validated through multiple approaches:

9.3 Economic Security

Beyond technical security measures, NM₿'s design incorporates economic incentives that align participant interests with network security:

CS = α × S + β × R + γ × L
Formula 3: Cost of Subversion (CS) as a function of Stake (S), Reputation (R), and Lost Future Revenue (L), with weight factors α, β, and γ

This economic security model ensures that the cost of attacking the network significantly exceeds any potential benefit, creating strong disincentives for malicious behavior.

• • •

10. Development Roadmap

The development of NM₿ follows a methodical, phased approach designed to progressively enhance functionality while maintaining security and stability.

10.1 Timeline

Phase Timeline Key Milestones
Research & Design Q3 2024 - Q1 2025
  • Whitepaper publication
  • Economic model simulations
  • Consensus mechanism specifications
Alpha Testnet Q2 2025
  • Core protocol implementation
  • Basic transaction functionality
  • Initial validator set
Beta Testnet Q3 2025
  • Smart contract platform
  • Developer tools and SDKs
  • Cross-chain adapters (BTC, ETH)
Mainnet Launch Q4 2025
  • Production network launch
  • Token generation event
  • Exchange listings
Ecosystem Growth Q1 2026 - Q2 2026
  • DeFi protocol deployments
  • Additional cross-chain integrations
  • Enterprise adoption initiatives
Governance Transition Q3 2026 - Q4 2026
  • Full DAO governance activation
  • Decentralized development grants
  • Protocol enhancement proposals
Research Q1 2025 Alpha Q2 2025 Beta Q3 2025 Mainnet Q4 2025 Ecosystem Q2 2026 Current Stage
Figure 6: NM₿ Development Timeline

10.2 Key Development Areas

Throughout this roadmap, several key development areas will receive particular focus:

Performance Optimization

Continuous refinement of consensus mechanisms and transaction processing to achieve and maintain high throughput and low latency.

Developer Experience

Creation of comprehensive SDKs, documentation, and developer tools across multiple programming languages to facilitate ecosystem growth.

Interoperability

Progressive expansion of cross-chain adapters to support a growing number of blockchain networks, with the goal of becoming a universal interoperability layer.

Enterprise Adoption

Development of enterprise-specific features including privacy options, compliance tools, and high-availability configurations.

10.3 Community Involvement

The development roadmap emphasizes community participation at every phase:

• • •

11. Use Cases and Applications

The NM₿ platform's unique combination of performance, interoperability, and developer-friendly features enables a wide range of applications that exceed the capabilities of existing blockchain solutions.

11.1 Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

NM₿'s high throughput and low transaction costs create an ideal foundation for DeFi applications that have previously been constrained by blockchain limitations:

High-Frequency Trading

Sub-second finality and high throughput enable decentralized exchanges with performance comparable to centralized alternatives, supporting high-frequency trading strategies that were previously impractical on-chain.

Cross-Chain DeFi

Native interoperability enables seamless liquidity aggregation across multiple blockchain ecosystems, allowing users to access the best yields and trading opportunities regardless of the underlying blockchain.

NM₿ Cross-Chain DEX From: 2.5 ETH To: 10,432.76 NM₿ Route: ETH → WETH → NM₿ Transaction fee: ~$0.002 Settlement time: <1 second
Figure 7: Conceptual User Interface for Cross-Chain Decentralized Exchange on NM₿

11.2 Enterprise Applications

NM₿'s architecture addresses key requirements for enterprise blockchain adoption:

Supply Chain Tracking

High throughput, low costs, and interoperability enable comprehensive supply chain tracking across multiple organizations and systems, with the ability to handle millions of IoT device updates in real-time.

Settlement Networks

Financial institutions can leverage NM₿'s performance for high-volume settlement networks with definitive finality and auditability, potentially replacing legacy settlement systems.

11.3 Web3 Infrastructure

Beyond specific applications, NM₿ serves as foundational infrastructure for the Web3 ecosystem:

Decentralized Identity

The platform's performance characteristics support decentralized identity solutions that can scale to billions of users and credentials while maintaining privacy and user control.

Content Distribution

NM₿'s data availability layer provides efficient storage and retrieval mechanisms for decentralized content distribution, enabling censorship-resistant media platforms and social networks.

Gaming and Metaverse

The combination of high throughput, low latency, and cross-chain asset portability creates new possibilities for blockchain gaming and metaverse applications that require real-time interaction and asset transfers.

"The most transformative blockchain applications have yet to be built, constrained not by imagination but by technical limitations. NM₿ removes these constraints, opening new frontiers for innovation."

• • •

12. Conclusion

NM₿ represents a significant advancement in blockchain technology, addressing the fundamental limitations that have hindered widespread adoption. Through its innovative Proof-of-Contribution consensus mechanism, multi-layered architecture, and focus on developer and user experience, NM₿ offers a platform capable of supporting the next generation of decentralized applications.

The combination of high throughput, low transaction costs, enhanced security, and cross-chain interoperability positions NM₿ as a comprehensive solution for enterprises, developers, and users seeking the benefits of blockchain technology without the traditional compromises.

Beyond technological innovation, NM₿ embodies a vision for a more accessible, efficient, and equitable digital infrastructure. By aligning incentives among various stakeholders and enabling new forms of cooperation and value exchange, the platform aims to accelerate the transition toward a more decentralized and user-centric digital economy.

As we progress through our development roadmap, we invite the global community to participate in this journey. Through open collaboration, continuous improvement, and shared governance, we believe NM₿ will play a pivotal role in bringing blockchain technology into the mainstream and unlocking its transformative potential across industries and use cases.

The future of blockchain is not just about technological advancement but about creating systems that enhance human coordination, trust, and creativity. With NM₿, we take an important step toward realizing this future.

© 2025 NM₿ Foundation

For more information, visit nm.bi

Download Full PDF (5.2 MB)